|
Author |
Just found a new bike engine to swap (currently 389 views) |
ken_parsons |
Posted on: Friday, October 2nd, 2015, 10:55:59pm |
|
|
Big Member
Posts: 183 Posts Per Day: 0.10 |
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
|
lord |
Posted on: Monday, October 5th, 2015, 12:36:05am |
|
|
|
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 1 - 8 |
|
|
ishigakisensei |
Posted on: Monday, October 5th, 2015, 12:39:25am |
|
|
Big Member
Posts: 141 Posts Per Day: 0.08 |
|
A turbo Busa engine works better and has been proven. Plus, its still Suzuki. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 2 - 8 |
|
|
ken_parsons |
Posted on: Monday, October 5th, 2015, 11:15:37pm |
|
|
Big Member
Posts: 183 Posts Per Day: 0.10 |
|
|
Quoted from ishigakisensei, posted Monday, October 5th, 2015, 12:39:25am at here |
|
A turbo Busa engine works better and has been proven. Plus, its still Suzuki.
|
|
It's also not £41,000 like the Kwaka, but that's not the point... |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 3 - 8 |
|
|
fxdlidon |
Posted on: Tuesday, October 6th, 2015, 7:30:20pm |
|
|
Maximum Member
Posts: 1446 Posts Per Day: 0.83 |
|
not sure you need the turbo with a busa engine - even stock it puts out over 180bhp, which is ample i reckon, saves on the extra plumbing too. well that's what I'm doing on my AZ-1 anyway.
would love to try that Kwak as a road bike though |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 4 - 8 |
|
|
Suzuki1234 |
Posted on: Friday, October 9th, 2015, 4:01:48am |
|
|
|
I still go with a hayabusa engine, I seen those little monster pushing 700hp. I like kawasaki but I like suzuki more, but if we are talking about the ultimate bike engine I think the engine in the MTT Turbine Superbike takes the prize . Engine;Rolls-Royce 250-C18 turboshaft Top speed;200mph + Power;320 shp (239 kW) @ 52000 rpm (Love those high rpm.) Torque;298 lb·ft (404 N·m) @ 2000 rpm ( Good amount of torque compare to a hayabusa v8 ) Torque your best friend when trying to fight nature. For the power hungry people like me that want even more power look at the new Y2K turbine motorcycle. Test have shown that it make 542hp and 450 lb-ft torque (http://www.gizmag.com/road-legal-madmax-turbine-motorcycle-speed-record/37954/) |
Last modified Saturday, October 10th, 2015, 4:39:24pm by Suzuki1234 |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 5 - 8 |
|
|
half-9 |
Posted on: Thursday, December 3rd, 2015, 3:44:43pm |
|
|
Big Member
Posts: 453 Posts Per Day: 0.32 |
|
I would actually advise against a hayabusa turbo engine, having experienced it now
Its just too much
H |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 6 - 8 |
|
|
pzooo |
Posted on: Saturday, December 5th, 2015, 4:08:08pm |
|
|
|
You will get used to the acceleration, but not to the noise and vibrations. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 7 - 8 |
|
|
ishigakisensei |
Posted on: Sunday, December 6th, 2015, 12:52:21am |
|
|
Big Member
Posts: 141 Posts Per Day: 0.08 |
|
|
Quoted from half-9, posted Thursday, December 3rd, 2015, 3:44:43pm at here |
|
I would actually advise against a hayabusa turbo engine, having experienced it now
Its just too much
H
|
|
No such thing as too much power. Too much right foot maybe, but never too much power.
Is your car boost by gear?
Since the Hayabusa engine swap is expensive and the G13B is becoming as rare as a unicorn, I go back to the K12b or K14b as better options. May not get 300hp+, but should get more than 200hp reliably and both K engines are far less expensive than a M16 engine here in Japan. |
|
Logged |
|
|
|
Reply: 8 - 8 |
|
|